- Undivided
- Posts
- Your Team Is Playing the Telephone Game
Your Team Is Playing the Telephone Game
Why outdated information spreads faster than updates (and how to stop it)
Your operations manager updates the pricing in the main spreadsheet.
Three weeks later, your sales team quotes the old prices to a major client.
Sound familiar?
You just experienced a sync failure—when information changes in one place but doesn't update everywhere else it's needed.
In software systems, this is such a critical problem that entire architectures are built around solving it. When data changes in one database, how do you ensure all the connected systems get updated?
Your business faces this exact same challenge. This happens when:
Policy changes that some team members never hear about
Process updates that don't reach everyone who needs to know
Price changes that don't make it to all customer-facing materials
New procedures that half the team follows while others use the old way
The result? Inconsistent customer experiences, internal confusion, and decisions made with outdated information.
You can solve this a few different ways:
Push Updates (Proactive). When information changes, it gets actively sent to everyone who needs it. Business example: Automated notifications when policies change
Pull Updates (Reactive). People periodically check if information has changed and update themselves. Business example: Monthly review of key documents and procedures
Real-time Sync. Changes are immediately reflected everywhere. Business example: Shared dashboards that update automatically
Event-driven Updates. Changes trigger specific actions to update related systems. Business example: Pricing change have a price list, so every time pricing changes, sales gets notified and materials are updated
Each of these methods address it differently. If you want to get everyone on the same page, you need to address:
Timing: How quickly do updates need to reach everyone?
Relevance: Who actually needs to know about each change?
Conflicts: What happens when two people change the same information differently?
Verification: How do you confirm that updates actually reached their destination?
Most of all, you need to watch out for the most dangerous sync issue: silent failures. This happens when people think they have current information but they're actually working with outdated data. Unlike obvious failures, these create problems that compound over time before anyone notices.
Cleaning this up is a simple process:
Map your information flows: What critical information moves between different people and systems?
Identify sync points: Where does information need to stay consistent across multiple locations?
Choose your sync strategy: Does this need real-time updates, scheduled syncing, or manual coordination?
Build verification: How will you know if sync failures occur?
Plan for conflicts: What happens when the same information gets changed in multiple places?
Here’s your homework:
What's one piece of critical information in your business that exists in multiple places and could get out of sync?
Where have you experienced problems because different people were working with different versions of the same information?
What sync failures might be happening right now that you don't know about?
Remember: In interconnected systems, the information is only as good as your ability to keep it synchronized across all the places it's needed.
P.S. This has been one of the biggest technical challenges for my largest clients. If you find yourself wrestling with these issues, let’s talk. I can help you cut through the noise.
Reply